English dictionary, thesaurus, translations & etymology
FreeDict.com
adjective

incoherent

Incoherent (adjective) means not making sense; lacking logical connection or clarity. Example: “His explanation was incoherent after the accident.”

adjective
1
Not making sense; lacking logical connection or clarity.
"His explanation was incoherent after the accident."
"The essay felt incoherent, jumping between unrelated points."

How to use incoherent

Learner’s notes

In plain EnglishConfusing or garbled — doesn't hold together logically.

Easily confused with
Common pairings
incoherent rambling incoherent argument completely incoherent

Word forms

more incoherent comparative, Incoherents plural, most incoherent superlative

Study it as flashcards or scroll it in Flow — saved to your collection.
Test yourself on “incoherent” A quick quiz — meaning, synonyms & usage

Fill the gap

Can you complete this real example?

His explanation was _____ after the accident.

Etymology

From in- ("not") + coherent, ultimately from Latin cohaerere, "to stick together."

Origin: Latin

Related words

Rhymes for incoherent

See all rhymes for incoherent →

Frequently asked questions

What does “incoherent” mean?

The word “incoherent” means not making sense; lacking logical connection or clarity. In plain terms, confusing or garbled — doesn't hold together logically.

How do you use “incoherent” in a sentence?

Here is “incoherent” used in a sentence: “His explanation was incoherent after the accident.”

What is another word for “incoherent”?

Words with a similar meaning to “incoherent” include uncoherent, unintelligible, unrelated, disjointed, desultory and jerky.

What is the opposite of “incoherent”?

The opposite of “incoherent” — its antonyms — is coherent.

What part of speech is “incoherent”?

“Incoherent” is an adjective.

Where does the word “incoherent” come from?

The word “incoherent” comes from Latin. From in- ("not") + coherent, ultimately from Latin cohaerere, "to stick together.".

People also searched

Definitions: FreeDict original editorial