English dictionary, thesaurus, translations & etymology
FreeDict.com

corroborate vs collaborate

What's the difference between corroborate and collaborate? Here's the clear answer, with examples of each.

Quick answer

To corroborate is to confirm something with supporting evidence — a second witness corroborates the first account. To collaborate is to work jointly with someone on a project. The words sound similar and mean entirely different things; only one involves other people by definition.

The core difference

Two Latin-derived verbs, close in sound and unrelated in sense.

  • corroborate — confirm with evidence: The records corroborate her account.
  • collaborate — work together: They collaborated on the design.

The roots explain them

Corroborate is from Latin robur, strength — literally to strengthen, which is what supporting evidence does to a claim. Collaborate is com- (together) plus laborare (to work). Once you see labor inside collaborate, the pair separates easily.

The other sense of collaborate

It also carries a darker meaning — cooperating with an occupying enemy. That is why collaborator can be either a co-author or a traitor, and context does all the work.

Frequently asked questions

How do I remember which is which?

Collaborate contains labor — working together. Corroborate comes from robur, strength — it strengthens a claim with evidence.

Can evidence collaborate a story?

No. Evidence corroborates. Collaborating requires working jointly with someone.

Why does collaborator sometimes mean traitor?

Because the word also covers cooperating with an occupying power, a sense that became prominent during the Second World War.

Usage guides: FreeDict original editorial.