English dictionary, thesaurus, translations & etymology
FreeDict.com

liable vs libel

What's the difference between liable and libel? Here's the clear answer, with examples of each.

Quick answer

Liable means legally responsible for something, or likely to do it. Libel is defamation in permanent form — published or written. They appear in the same legal contexts, which is why they get swapped: you can be liable for libel, and that sentence uses both correctly.

The core difference

One is a state of responsibility; the other is a specific wrong.

  • liable — legally responsible: liable for damages. Also: likely to — liable to break.
  • libel — published defamation: sued for libel.

Libel versus slander

Libel is defamation in permanent form — writing, print, broadcast, online. Slander is spoken. The distinction matters because the two have historically been treated differently in law, with libel generally the more serious because it persists and spreads.

The second sense of liable

"Liable to" meaning likely to — liable to rain — is entirely standard and usually carries a hint of something unwelcome. That sense has nothing to do with legal responsibility.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between libel and slander?

Libel is defamation in permanent form — written, printed or broadcast. Slander is spoken.

Can you be liable for libel?

Yes, and that sentence uses both words correctly: liable means responsible, libel is the wrong itself.

Does liable always concern law?

No. "Liable to" also means likely to, usually of something unwelcome — liable to fail.

Usage guides: FreeDict original editorial.